Under most circumstances, I couldn't care less about Paris Hilton and her hair, but this article caught my eye.
Paris Hilton sued for wearing the wrong hair
If you don't want to waste your time reading about Hilton, she's being sued for allegedly failing to wear a particular brand of hair extensions after being paid US$3.5 million to do so.
And I am left wondering: How can the company that believes they were wronged tell Hilton was not wearing THEIR hair extensions? Do you women folk swap hair extension tips while you luxuriate in public rest rooms? Was Hilton's failure to honor her contract discovered because there is a way to tell virgin hair from non-virgin hair? (Apparently, the product Hilton agreed to lend her name and face to is made from the hair of European virgins--or so the online listing for Hairtech International products imply, as the first paragraph on this random page shows. Maybe she was busted because virgin hair would look decidedly unnatural on someone as well-used as Paris Hilton?)
Please help educate a curious bachelor whose female friends would just turn away and laugh. How can you tell if Paris Hilton is wearing the hair of a virgin in this photo from a 2008 media event held specifically to promote the Band-It hair extension product from HairTech International?
(While contemplating the mysteries of telling one brand of hair extensions from another, perhaps you would be interested in reading reviews of movies featuring Paris Hilton at Terror Titans.)
Currently Showing at Cinema Steve
-
-
31 Nights of Halloween: Trick or Truth? - "The Silent Watcher" (sadly one of the many great early films that have been lost) tells of four sorority sisters, the handyman they all lust after, and th...1 week ago
-
Richard Sala's Panique: An Unauthorized Second Editon! - [image: 'Panique' cover art by Richard Sala] SECOND EDITION *Design*: Richard Sala & Steve Miller *Editing*: Steve Miller *INTRODUCTION* In 1994, artist/wr...1 year ago
-
Mystery Monday: Hush - [image: Kavya Trehan In "Hush" (2018)] The impact of some films is ruined if a reviewer blathers on about it. This is one of those. Watch this one minute o...1 year ago
-
No doubt that 'Shadow of a Doubt' is great - *Shadow of a Doubt (1943)* Starring: Teresa Wright, Joseph Cotton, Macdonald Carey, Henry Travers, and Patricia Collinge Director: Alfred Hitchcock Stars: T...3 years ago
-
Neat film with an all-star cast AND a werewolf! - *The Beast Must Die (aka "Black Werewolf") (1974)* Starring: Calvin Lockhart, Anton Diffring, Peter Cushing, Marlene Clark, Michael Gambon, Tom Chadbon, Ci...3 years ago
-
'Evil Bong 666' breathes new life into the series - *Evil Bong 666 (2017)* Starring: Mindy Robinson, Robin Sydney, Sonny Carl Davis, Michelle Mais, Jessica Morris, and The Don Director: Charles Band Rating: F...5 years ago
-
A Franco foul-up that's kinda saved by unintentional comedy - *Neurosis: The Fall of the House of Usher (aka "Revenge in the House of Usher" and "Zombie 5") (1982)* Starring: Howard Vernon, Robert Foster, Lina Romay, J...12 years ago
-
Happy Birthday to Boris Karloff - On this day in 1887, the great Boris Karloff was born. To mark his birthday, here's a review of one of his many films that deserve more attention than it g...13 years ago
-
The Addams Family was never as creepy as this father/daugher duo - Mark of the Vampire (aka "Vampires of Prague") (1935) Starring: Lionel Barrymore, Lionel Atwill, Elizabeth Allen, Jean Hersholt, Henry Wadsworth, Donald Mee...15 years ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I want to know how a hair extension company was able to pay anyone 3.5 million dollars for an endorsement....
ReplyDeleteIs it really that big of a business?
I asked a friend of mine who has some knowledge in this field... and, yes, apparently hair extensions ARE a big enough business to gamble on the sort of payment given to Hilton.
ReplyDeleteBy all appearances, though, HairTech LOST this particular gamble... which is why they've bought a ticket in the Lawsuit Lottery.